staem被盜_如何檢查照片是否被盜

staem被盜

Photos and other images get stolen all the time online. Someone takes a photo from the photographer’s website or social media channels and uses it for their own needs. This is completely illegal and happens to me all the time here at How-To Geek.

照片和其他圖像一直在線被盜。有人從攝影師的網站或社交媒體渠道拍攝照片，并將其用于自己的需求。這是完全違法的，我一直在這里出現在How-To Geek。

Let’s do a quick copyright law refresher. Unless the photographer signs away the copyright to their images or releases them into the public domain, they are the sole and automatic copyright holder. Using their images without their permission is copyright infringement unless you have a very specific “fair use” grounds for doing it—and trust me, you probably don’t. Just because an image is “freely available” on the internet, doesn’t mean you have the right to take it and use it.

讓我們快速回顧一下版權法。除非攝影師放棄其圖像的版權或將其釋放到公共領域，否則他們是唯一的自動版權持有者。除非您有非常明確的“合理使用”依據，否則未經其許可使用其圖像即會侵犯版權，并且相信我，您可能不會這樣做。僅僅因為圖像可以在互聯網上“免費獲得”，并不意味著您有權使用和使用它。

Stealing images is super common, so how can you tell if a photo on a website has been taken from somewhere else? Let’s find out.

偷圖片非??常普遍，那么如何分辨網站上的照片是否是從其他地方拍攝的呢？讓我們找出答案。

檢查版權數據 (Check for Copyright Data)

The simplest way to check if an image is being used without permission is to check if there’s any embedded copyright metadata. You can download the image and check using your operating system’s built-in tools, but it’s quicker and easier to use an online metadata viewer like Metapicz.

檢查是否未經許可使用圖像的最簡單方法是檢查是否有任何嵌入的版權元數據。您可以下載圖像并使用操作系統的內置工具進行檢查，但是使用諸如Metapicz之類的在線元數據查看器更加便捷。

Right click on the image you want to check and click “Copy Image Address.” Note that the exact wording of that command might be different in different browsers, but you’ll find the command you’re after.

右鍵單擊要檢查的圖像，然后單擊“復制圖像地址”。請注意，在不同的瀏覽器中，該命令的確切措詞可能有所不同，但是您會找到所需的命令。

Head to Metapicz, paste in the URL you copied, and click the “Go” button.

轉到Metapicz，粘貼您復制的URL，然后單擊“開始”按鈕。

You’ll see all the metadata that’s embedded in the image. If it’s there, the copyright data will be front and center. You can see that—shockingly—I’m the copyright holder for the image I’m using as an example.

If the copyright data doesn’t line up with the page where it’s posted, then there’s a good chance it’s being used without permission. For example, I hold the copyright to most of the photos in my articles on How-To Geek, but since I write here and have an author page here, everything is probably above board. If, on the other hand, you find images with my copyright information embedded where there’s no connection between me and the site, then things probably aren’t on the level.

如果版權數據與發布的頁面不一致，那么很有可能未經許可就使用了版權數據。例如，我在《 How-To Geek》的文章中擁有大多數照片的版權，但是由于我在這里寫文章并在此處擁有一個作者頁面，因此一切可能都超出了我的范圍。另一方面，如果在我和網站之間沒有任何聯系的情況下找到嵌入了我的版權信息的圖像，則可能是問題所在。

Now, this isn’t a perfect method. It’s simple to strip out any metadata, including copyright information. It might also not be embedded in the first place. That’s the case with more than a few of my images on the site. Just because it’s not there, though, doesn’t mean that the image isn’t copyrighted.

現在，這不是一個完美的方法。剝離所有元數據(包括版權信息)很簡單。它可能也不會一開始就被嵌入。網站上有很多我的圖片就是這種情況。但是，僅僅因為它不存在，并不意味著該圖像沒有版權。

With all that said, I do find it funny that when my photos are taken from How-To Geek and end up on other sites, the copyright information is often left embedded.

話雖這么說，我的確很有趣，當我的照片是從How-To Geek拍攝并出現在其他網站上時，版權信息通常會被嵌入。

使用反向圖像搜索 (Use Reverse Image Search)

The other good way to find out if a photo has been stolen is to use a reverse image search and a bit of detective work.

找出照片是否被盜的另一種好方法是使用反向圖像搜索和一些偵探工作。

There are a few different reverse image sites out there. Google’s is the most well known, but Bing also has a good one. TinEye is interesting, and their matching technology is better than most. Unfortunately, I’ve found they don’t crawl a lot of the sites where my images end up, so their database is far less complete. For this article, I’m going to use Google.

有一些不同的反向圖像站點。 Google最為人所知，但Bing也有一個很好的例子。 TinEye很有趣，它們的匹配技術也比大多數更好。不幸的是，我發現他們并沒有抓取我的圖像最終到達的許多站點，因此它們的數據庫還不夠完善。對于本文，我將使用Google。

On the Google Images page click the little camera icon in the search bar.

在Google圖片頁面上，點擊搜索欄中的小相機圖標。

Either paste in a URL or upload a file from your computer.

粘貼URL或從計算機上載文件。

Google will show you what it thinks the image is as well as some visually similar photos, but what we’re interested in is the “Pages That Include Matching Images” section.

Google會向您顯示它認為圖像的外觀以及一些視覺上相似的照片，但我們感興趣的是“包含匹配圖像的頁面”部分。

You can see there are two How-To Geek links—totally authorized uses of my photo—and three non-How-To Geek pages. They’re all using this photo of mine illegally.

您可以看到有兩個How-To Geek鏈接(完全授權使用我的照片)和三個非How-To Geek頁面。他們都在非法使用我的這張照片。

This is where the detective work comes into play. Since we’re using a photo we know has been stolen from How-To Geek, it’s easy to guess which the original is. If we didn’t already know this, we’d need to go through each site and check things like:

這是偵探工作發揮作用的地方。由于我們使用的是我們知道的照片，因此我們知道該照片是從How-To Geek被盜的，因此很容易猜出是哪張照片。如果我們還不知道這一點，則需要遍歷每個站點并檢查以下內容：

Which article was posted first; it’s not a perfect test, but it’s one of the best.
首先發表哪篇文章；這不是一個完美的測試，但這是最好的測試之一。
Which site seems the most reputable. It’s another imperfect, but an often reliable test.
哪個網站最有名。這是另一個不完善的測試，但通常是可靠的測試。
Where the image is available in the highest resolution since it’s more likely to be the original.
圖像分辨率最高的位置，因為它更有可能是原始圖像。
If there is a color version or other less edited version, it’s probably the original. Removing text from a photo or adding color to a black and white image is a lot of work.
如果有彩色版本或其他較少編輯的版本，則可能是原始版本。從照片中刪除文本或為黑白圖像添加顏色是很多工作。
Does the image appear in any photographer’s portfolio websites? While some photographers steal photos and claim them as their own, it’s not as common as random people stealing from photographers’ websites.
該圖像是否出現在任何攝影師的作品集網站中？盡管有些攝影師偷了照片并聲稱擁有自己的照片，但不像隨機的人從攝影師的網站上偷照片那樣普遍。

It’s become increasingly common for people stealing images—at least those who know what they’re doing—to make some edits to the images they take. I tested Google’s reverse image search to see how it did at detecting some simple edits and, to be honest, it blew me away.

對于竊取圖像的人們(至少是那些知道自己在做什么的人)進行編輯的圖像，變得越來越普遍。我測試了Google的反向圖片搜索，以了解它在檢測到一些簡單編輯后的效果，說實話，它讓我大吃一驚。

I tested:

我測試了：

A black and white version of the photo.
照片的黑白版本。
A cropped version of the photo.
照片的裁剪版本。
A cropped black and white version of the photo.
照片的黑白版本。
A cropped version of the photo with text added.
帶有文字的照片的裁剪版本。
A cropped high contrast version of the photo.
裁剪后的高對比度照片。
A cropped high contrast version of the photos with the colors changed.
裁剪后的高對比度版本照片的顏色發生了變化。
A cropped, reversed version of the photo.
裁剪后的照片反轉版本。

Google only failed on the very last one. It didn’t matter that I changed the colors or added text, it still returned the same results. That’s pretty incredible. Someone would really have to make an effort to change an image quite a bit for Google not to catch it.

Google僅在最后一個失敗了。更改顏色或添加文本都沒關系，它仍然返回相同的結果。太不可思議了。確實有人必須努力改變圖像，以使Google不能捕獲它。

Image theft—or more specifically, images being used without appropriate permission—is a big problem online. It can also be an expensive one. If you use someone’s photo without their permission, you could be on the hook for thousands of dollars. Just be careful when you’re using images you haven’t paid a stock photo site for or when you don’t know exactly who took them.

圖像盜竊(或更具體地說，未經適當許可而使用圖像)是在線上的大問題。它也可能是昂貴的。如果未經他人許可而使用某人的照片，則可能要花上數千美元。請注意，當您使用尚未為股票照片網站付款的圖像時，或者當您不知道確切地由誰拍攝時。