by Sacha Greif

由Sacha Greif

宣布JavaScript 2017狀況調查 (Announcing the State of JavaScript 2017 Survey)

讓我們找出去年以來發生的變化！ (Let’s find out what’s changed since last year!)

In a hurry? You can take the survey here.

匆忙？ 您可以在這里進行調查 。

When I launched the first State of JavaScript survey last year, it was mostly to scratch my own itch. I wanted to know what libraries were worth learning, and which ones were on the way out.

去年我發起第一次JavaScript狀態調查時 ，主要是為了摸索。 我想知道哪些圖書館值得學習，哪些正在淘汰。

It turns out, I wasn’t the only one with that itch. Over 9,000 people took the time to answer the survey’s 89 questions. The resulting data was a trove of interesting insights.

事實證明，我不是唯一一個發癢的人。 超過9,000人花時間回答了調查的89個問題。 產生的數據是許多有趣的見解。

For example, we learned that although 11% of respondents had ever tried Vue, 89% of Vue users were happy enough to continue using it. And, on the other hand, although 64% of respondents had used Angular, only 47% of Angular users were looking forward to working with it again.

例如，我們了解到，盡管有11％的受訪者曾經嘗試過Vue ，但89％的Vue用戶對繼續使用它感到滿意。 另一方面，盡管64％的受訪者使用過Angular，但只有47％的Angular用戶希望再次使用它。

You can find many more data points like this by exploring the 2016 results.

通過探索2016年的結果，您可以找到更多類似的數據點。

更好的數據 (Better Data)

So what’s new for 2017? One criticism we got last time was that it wasn’t clear where the data was coming from. Where were the respondents located? How did they hear about the survey?

那么，2017年有什么新消息？ 我們上次收到的批評是，不清楚數據來自何處。 受訪者在哪里？ 他們是如何得知這項調查的？

For that reason, the survey will also track metadata like your referrer, location, browser type, and so on. Of course, it goes without saying that this data will remain completely anonymous.

因此，調查還將跟蹤元數據，例如您的引薦來源網址，位置，瀏覽器類型等。 當然，不用說此數據將保持完全匿名。

Hopefully that extra metadata will let us do cool things, like comparing geographic trends, or seeing if respondents coming from, say, Reddit vs Hacker News tend to use different technologies.

希望額外的元數據可以讓我們做一些很棒的事情，例如比較地理趨勢，或者看看來自Reddit vs Hacker News的受訪者是否傾向于使用不同的技術。

新問題 (New Questions)

We made a few changes to the questions. Some technologies are out (like CoffeeScript and Cucumber), while some are in (like Reason and Flow).

我們對問題進行了一些更改。 有些技術已經淘汰(例如CoffeeScript和Cucumber)，而有些技術已經淘汰(例如Reason和Flow)。

Of course, you can still fill in your framework of choice in the “Other” section even if it’s missing from the main options.

當然，即使主選項中缺少選擇的框架，您仍然可以在“其他”部分中填寫選擇的框架。

We also changed the structure of the question groups slightly. Instead of trying to isolate each layer of the stack in its own group, we now have larger, more inclusive groupings such as “Data Layer” or “Back-end.”

我們還稍微更改了問題組的結構。 現在，我們不再嘗試將堆棧的每一層都隔離在其自己的組中，而是擁有更大，更具包容性的分組，例如“數據層”或“后端”。

Of course, no organization is perfect. For example, GraphQL, Redux, and Apollo all end up in the same Data Layer group, even though they’re all complementary technologies. But hopefully it’ll still make some amount of sense to you.

當然，沒有組織是完美的。 例如，GraphQL，Redux和Apollo最終都屬于同一數據層組，即使它們都是互補技術也是如此。 但是希望它對您仍然有意義。

StateOfJS團隊的新成員 (A New StateOfJS Team Member)

I ran last year’s survey by myself, but since I wanted to do more with the results this time around, I got my friend Michael Rambeau to come on board as well.

我自己進行了去年的調查，但是由于這次我想對結果做更多??的事情，所以我也邀請了我的朋友邁克爾·蘭博 ( Michael Rambeau)加入。

Michael runs BestOfJS, a live directory that tracks open-source JavaScript libraries and provides detailed stats on their popularity. So I think there’s no better person to help with the State of JS project!

Michael運行BestOfJS ，這是一個實時目錄，該目錄跟蹤開源JavaScript庫并提供有關其流行程度的詳細統計信息。 因此，我認為沒有更好的人來協助State JS項目！

讓我們開始吧 (Let’s Get Started)

But enough talk! Go ahead and take the survey now. See you again a couple weeks from now for the results!

但是足夠多的談話！ 繼續進行并立即進行調查 。 從現在起兩周后再見，以取得結果！

翻譯自: https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/announcing-the-state-of-javascript-2017-survey-13e8742270d5/